The Great Transfer - Justice

There has been a lot of confession and no ranting recently, again, so I shall embark upon a spewing spree;

Who actively campaigns for Human Rights in this country any more? We have a ratified constitution which the EU enforces onto us which any criminal will be able to cite if they feel that their Rights are being contravened, so there is more than sufficient precedent that these people just need a semi-decent lawyer and NOT a string of middle-Britain busybodies ensuring that more, random Human Rights are given to people.

Case in point, the recent story about the terrorists responsible for the car bombing of Glasgow Airport. We cannot deport these people back to their native countries because the conditions there are worse than they are here.

That's right, my friends; we cannot expunge ourselves of a group of people who actively plotted to destroy our fellow countrymen because they'll face a hard life in their own countries. How fucking stupid is that? Seriously, these people should realistically have forfeited their rights as soon as they decided to commit indiscriminate murder.

Why don't we try to enforce Human Responsibilities? Why don't we say that if you rape someone, you try to murder them, you peddle drugs to them and permanently fuck their health, you steal millions of pounds and ruin just as many lives, you have forfeited your Human Rights because you haven't acted like a FUCKING HUMAN?

We already technically do it; we force them into prisons, which surely contravenes their right to not stay in the same room for fifteen years? Why not take it a step further and make it so that people who commit crimes above a certain level, say one year's prison time, lose a series of their human rights?

Again, there is precedence; after you've been to prison, you can't vote. So why not say that you don't have the right to claim asylum, or to claim benefits from the government for doing F' all?

Obviously, here would need to be a reintegration scheme which would allow those who genuinely want to repent; say, a five year scheme in which they are placed into jobs which match their skills and are monitored regularly. After the five years, though, employers would not have the right to know what crime they had committed when considering them for a job?

(Notable exceptions: sexual and financial crimes.)

I am such a serious, non-liberal, aren't I? I guess I just have a really strong sense of justice and know how I think people should pay for their actions.

In pain, comparable with the pain which they have caused to others.